linux - DKIM : Signature header exists but is not valid -

-

i have configured postfix spf , dkim emails marked spam.

here domain.db (i use bind9) :

... mail._domainkey in      txt     ( "v=dkim1; k=rsa; p=abcd" )

i verify :

host -t txt mail._domainkey.domain.com

i receive (ok) :

mail._domainkey.domain.com descriptive text "v=dkim1\; k=rsa\; " "p=abcd"

i've checked problem on email-tester.com, , 10/10, dkim seems correctly installed.

but when check content of email, see : 

... dkim:pass dkim:pass spf:pass ... x-spam-report:  * -0.0 no_relays informational: message not relayed via smtp * -0.0 no_received informational: message has no received headers *  0.0 t_dkim_invalid dkim-signature header exists not valid  x-spam-status: no, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=no_received,no_relays, t_dkim_invalid autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0

any idea ?

----- update -------

after adding in master.cf :

-o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_milters

here new email content :

... dkim:pass   (now there one: ok) spf:pass  ... x-spam-report:  * -1.0 all_trusted passed through trusted hosts via smtp  x-spam-status: no, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=all_trusted autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0

which seems better, email still marked spam, grrr

here's what's going on spf record.

go link , change dns server `google public dns (8.8.8.8) 

https://www.unlocktheinbox.com/dnstools/spf/luckeo.fr/

the results of spf v=spf mx ip4:176.58.101.240 ~all

now change dns advantage (156.154.70.1)

the results of spf v=spf1 mx ip4:176.58.101.240 ~all

notice difference v=spf vs v=spf1

so dns hasn't propagated yet , depending on how receiving email server looks dns records you're running issues. wait 24 hours , if you're still having issues, reply back.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

matlab - error with cyclic autocorrelation function -

-
Image
i'm trying code cyclic autocorrelation function in matlab follows: t=0:(n-1); t=t*te; i_alpha=0; tau=-n2*te:te:n2*te; alpha=-1/2:1/n:1/2; ryy_cl=zeros(length(alpha),length(tau)); alpha=alpha/te ind_tau=0; i_alpha=i_alpha+1; k=tau ind_tau=ind_tau+1; if k>0 % ryy_cl(i_alpha,ind_tau)=1/length(sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end- k))*sum((sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end-k)).*sig_bin_syl_mod(k+1:end)).*exp(1i*2*pi*alpha*t(1+k:length(sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end)))); ryy_cl(i_alpha,ind_tau)=(1/n)*sum((sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end-k)).*sig_bin_syl_mod(k+1:end)).*exp(-1i*2*pi*alpha*t(1:end-k)); else ryy_cl(i_alpha,ind_tau)=(1/n)*sum((sig_bin_syl_mod(1-k:end)).*sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end+k)).*exp(-1i*2*pi*alpha*t(1-k:end)); end end end i'm getting errors, , doesn't show expecting. according below formulae, how can fix it? the code provided incomplete, difficult confidently reproduce error. in particular, haven't de...
Read more

django - (fields.E300) Field defines a relation with model 'AbstractEmailUser' which is either not installed, or is abstract -

-
i trying create customuser django project email username , add radio button truck , company. in registration process email-id registered per truck or company. mentioned radio button 'tag' , add manytomany field tag in emailuser model. when makemigrations, raising error : (fields.e300) field defines relation model 'abstractemailuser' either not installed, or abstract. i quite new django , not sure whether have created correct code wants. please me solving this. here code, models.py: import django django.contrib.auth.models import ( abstractbaseuser, baseusermanager, permissionsmixin) django.core.mail import send_mail django.db import models django.utils import timezone django.utils.translation import ugettext_lazy _ class emailusermanager(baseusermanager): """custom manager emailuser.""" def _create_user(self, email, password, is_staff, is_superuser, **extra_fields): """create , save emailus...
Read more

c# - What is a good .Net RefEdit control to use with ExcelDna? -

-
i using exceldna , c# build suite of tools. part of forms i'd want user select cells/ranges workbook. i've got application.inputbox route working...but doesn't cool... i haven't read many things excel's refedit control, , see many have in past written workarounds, in (shudder) vba or vb.net. however, none of these seem recent... best approach/control refedit functionality on form run via exceldna (if applicable)? the refedit sample project of github explores different ways of dealing threading when showing form excel add-in, main issue making refedit control .net add-in. check page links various other implementations: https://github.com/excel-dna/exceldna/wiki/links-about-refedit
Read more