multithreading - Java: notify() vs. notifyAll() all over again -

-

if 1 googles "difference between notify() , notifyall()" lot of explanations pop (leaving apart javadoc paragraphs). boils down number of waiting threads being waken up: 1 in notify() , in notifyall().

however (if understand difference between these methods right), 1 thread selected further monitor acquisition; in first case 1 selected vm, in second case 1 selected system thread scheduler. exact selection procedures both of them (in general case) not known programmer.

what's useful difference between notify() , notifyall() then? missing something?

simply put, depends on why threads waiting notified. want tell 1 of waiting threads happened, or want tell of them @ same time?

in cases, waiting threads can take useful action once wait finishes. example set of threads waiting task finish; once task has finished, waiting threads can continue business. in such case use notifyall() wake waiting threads @ same time.

another case, example mutually exclusive locking, 1 of waiting threads can useful after being notified (in case acquire lock). in such case, rather use notify(). implemented, could use notifyall() in situation well, unnecessarily wake threads can't anyway.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

matlab - error with cyclic autocorrelation function -

-
Image
i'm trying code cyclic autocorrelation function in matlab follows: t=0:(n-1); t=t*te; i_alpha=0; tau=-n2*te:te:n2*te; alpha=-1/2:1/n:1/2; ryy_cl=zeros(length(alpha),length(tau)); alpha=alpha/te ind_tau=0; i_alpha=i_alpha+1; k=tau ind_tau=ind_tau+1; if k>0 % ryy_cl(i_alpha,ind_tau)=1/length(sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end- k))*sum((sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end-k)).*sig_bin_syl_mod(k+1:end)).*exp(1i*2*pi*alpha*t(1+k:length(sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end)))); ryy_cl(i_alpha,ind_tau)=(1/n)*sum((sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end-k)).*sig_bin_syl_mod(k+1:end)).*exp(-1i*2*pi*alpha*t(1:end-k)); else ryy_cl(i_alpha,ind_tau)=(1/n)*sum((sig_bin_syl_mod(1-k:end)).*sig_bin_syl_mod(1:end+k)).*exp(-1i*2*pi*alpha*t(1-k:end)); end end end i'm getting errors, , doesn't show expecting. according below formulae, how can fix it? the code provided incomplete, difficult confidently reproduce error. in particular, haven't de...
Read more

django - (fields.E300) Field defines a relation with model 'AbstractEmailUser' which is either not installed, or is abstract -

-
i trying create customuser django project email username , add radio button truck , company. in registration process email-id registered per truck or company. mentioned radio button 'tag' , add manytomany field tag in emailuser model. when makemigrations, raising error : (fields.e300) field defines relation model 'abstractemailuser' either not installed, or abstract. i quite new django , not sure whether have created correct code wants. please me solving this. here code, models.py: import django django.contrib.auth.models import ( abstractbaseuser, baseusermanager, permissionsmixin) django.core.mail import send_mail django.db import models django.utils import timezone django.utils.translation import ugettext_lazy _ class emailusermanager(baseusermanager): """custom manager emailuser.""" def _create_user(self, email, password, is_staff, is_superuser, **extra_fields): """create , save emailus...
Read more

c# - What is a good .Net RefEdit control to use with ExcelDna? -

-
i using exceldna , c# build suite of tools. part of forms i'd want user select cells/ranges workbook. i've got application.inputbox route working...but doesn't cool... i haven't read many things excel's refedit control, , see many have in past written workarounds, in (shudder) vba or vb.net. however, none of these seem recent... best approach/control refedit functionality on form run via exceldna (if applicable)? the refedit sample project of github explores different ways of dealing threading when showing form excel add-in, main issue making refedit control .net add-in. check page links various other implementations: https://github.com/excel-dna/exceldna/wiki/links-about-refedit
Read more